Genetic differentiation and delimitation between ecologically diverged Populus euphratica and P. pruinosa.
Identifieur interne : 002E66 ( Main/Exploration ); précédent : 002E65; suivant : 002E67Genetic differentiation and delimitation between ecologically diverged Populus euphratica and P. pruinosa.
Auteurs : Juan Wang [République populaire de Chine] ; Yuxia Wu ; Guangpeng Ren ; Qiuhong Guo ; Jianquan Liu ; Martin LascouxSource :
- PloS one [ 1932-6203 ] ; 2011.
Descripteurs français
- KwdFr :
- ADN des chloroplastes (génétique), Climat désertique (MeSH), Espaceur de l'ADN ribosomique (génétique), Locus génétiques (génétique), Marqueurs génétiques (génétique), Phylogenèse (MeSH), Phénomènes écologiques et environnementaux (MeSH), Polymorphisme génétique (génétique), Populus (génétique), Répétitions microsatellites (génétique), Évolution moléculaire (MeSH).
- MESH :
English descriptors
- KwdEn :
- DNA, Chloroplast (genetics), DNA, Ribosomal Spacer (genetics), Desert Climate (MeSH), Ecological and Environmental Phenomena (MeSH), Evolution, Molecular (MeSH), Genetic Loci (genetics), Genetic Markers (genetics), Microsatellite Repeats (genetics), Phylogeny (MeSH), Polymorphism, Genetic (genetics), Populus (genetics).
- MESH :
- chemical , genetics : DNA, Chloroplast, DNA, Ribosomal Spacer, Genetic Markers.
- genetics : Genetic Loci, Microsatellite Repeats, Polymorphism, Genetic, Populus.
- Desert Climate, Ecological and Environmental Phenomena, Evolution, Molecular, Phylogeny.
Abstract
BACKGROUND
The fixed genetic differences between ecologically divergent species were found to change greatly depending on the markers examined. With such species it is difficult to differentiate between shared ancestral polymorphisms and past introgressions between the diverging species. In order to disentangle these possibilities and provide a further case for DNA barcoding of plants, we examine genetic differentiation between two ecologically divergent poplar species, Populus euphratica Oliver and P. pruinosa Schrenk using three different types of genetic marker.
METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS
We genotyped 290 individuals from 29 allopatric and sympatric populations, using chloroplast (cp) DNA, nuclear (nr) ITS sequences and eight simple sequence repeat (SSR) loci. Three major cpDNA haplotypes were widely shared between the two species and between-species cpDNA differentiation (F(CT)) was very low, even lower than among single species populations. The average SSR F(CT) values were higher. Bayesian clustering analysis of all loci allowed a clear delineation of the two species. Gene flow, determined by examining all SSR loci, was obvious but only slightly asymmetrical. However, the two species were almost fixed for two different nrITS genotypes that had the highest F(CT), although a few introgressed individuals were detected both in allopatric and sympatric populations.
CONCLUSIONS
The two species shared numerous ancestral polymorphisms at cpDNA and a few SSR loci. Both ITS and a combination of nuclear SSR data could be used to differentiate between the two species. Introgressions and gene flow were obvious between the two species either during or after their divergence. Our findings underscore the complex genetic differentiations between ecologically diverged species and highlight the importance of nuclear DNA (especially ITS) differentiation for delimiting closely related plant species.
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026530
PubMed: 22028897
PubMed Central: PMC3197521
Affiliations:
Links toward previous steps (curation, corpus...)
Le document en format XML
<record><TEI><teiHeader><fileDesc><titleStmt><title xml:lang="en">Genetic differentiation and delimitation between ecologically diverged Populus euphratica and P. pruinosa.</title><author><name sortKey="Wang, Juan" sort="Wang, Juan" uniqKey="Wang J" first="Juan" last="Wang">Juan Wang</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Molecular Ecology Group, State Key Laboratory of Grassland Farming System, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">République populaire de Chine</country><wicri:regionArea>Molecular Ecology Group, State Key Laboratory of Grassland Farming System, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Gansu</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Wu, Yuxia" sort="Wu, Yuxia" uniqKey="Wu Y" first="Yuxia" last="Wu">Yuxia Wu</name></author><author><name sortKey="Ren, Guangpeng" sort="Ren, Guangpeng" uniqKey="Ren G" first="Guangpeng" last="Ren">Guangpeng Ren</name></author><author><name sortKey="Guo, Qiuhong" sort="Guo, Qiuhong" uniqKey="Guo Q" first="Qiuhong" last="Guo">Qiuhong Guo</name></author><author><name sortKey="Liu, Jianquan" sort="Liu, Jianquan" uniqKey="Liu J" first="Jianquan" last="Liu">Jianquan Liu</name></author><author><name sortKey="Lascoux, Martin" sort="Lascoux, Martin" uniqKey="Lascoux M" first="Martin" last="Lascoux">Martin Lascoux</name></author></titleStmt><publicationStmt><idno type="wicri:source">PubMed</idno><date when="2011">2011</date><idno type="RBID">pubmed:22028897</idno><idno type="pmid">22028897</idno><idno type="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0026530</idno><idno type="pmc">PMC3197521</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Corpus">002C47</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Corpus" wicri:corpus="PubMed">002C47</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Curation">002C47</idno><idno type="wicri:explorRef" wicri:stream="Main" wicri:step="Curation">002C47</idno><idno type="wicri:Area/Main/Exploration">002C47</idno></publicationStmt><sourceDesc><biblStruct><analytic><title xml:lang="en">Genetic differentiation and delimitation between ecologically diverged Populus euphratica and P. pruinosa.</title><author><name sortKey="Wang, Juan" sort="Wang, Juan" uniqKey="Wang J" first="Juan" last="Wang">Juan Wang</name><affiliation wicri:level="1"><nlm:affiliation>Molecular Ecology Group, State Key Laboratory of Grassland Farming System, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.</nlm:affiliation><country xml:lang="fr">République populaire de Chine</country><wicri:regionArea>Molecular Ecology Group, State Key Laboratory of Grassland Farming System, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu</wicri:regionArea><wicri:noRegion>Gansu</wicri:noRegion></affiliation></author><author><name sortKey="Wu, Yuxia" sort="Wu, Yuxia" uniqKey="Wu Y" first="Yuxia" last="Wu">Yuxia Wu</name></author><author><name sortKey="Ren, Guangpeng" sort="Ren, Guangpeng" uniqKey="Ren G" first="Guangpeng" last="Ren">Guangpeng Ren</name></author><author><name sortKey="Guo, Qiuhong" sort="Guo, Qiuhong" uniqKey="Guo Q" first="Qiuhong" last="Guo">Qiuhong Guo</name></author><author><name sortKey="Liu, Jianquan" sort="Liu, Jianquan" uniqKey="Liu J" first="Jianquan" last="Liu">Jianquan Liu</name></author><author><name sortKey="Lascoux, Martin" sort="Lascoux, Martin" uniqKey="Lascoux M" first="Martin" last="Lascoux">Martin Lascoux</name></author></analytic><series><title level="j">PloS one</title><idno type="eISSN">1932-6203</idno><imprint><date when="2011" type="published">2011</date></imprint></series></biblStruct></sourceDesc></fileDesc><profileDesc><textClass><keywords scheme="KwdEn" xml:lang="en"><term>DNA, Chloroplast (genetics)</term><term>DNA, Ribosomal Spacer (genetics)</term><term>Desert Climate (MeSH)</term><term>Ecological and Environmental Phenomena (MeSH)</term><term>Evolution, Molecular (MeSH)</term><term>Genetic Loci (genetics)</term><term>Genetic Markers (genetics)</term><term>Microsatellite Repeats (genetics)</term><term>Phylogeny (MeSH)</term><term>Polymorphism, Genetic (genetics)</term><term>Populus (genetics)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="KwdFr" xml:lang="fr"><term>ADN des chloroplastes (génétique)</term><term>Climat désertique (MeSH)</term><term>Espaceur de l'ADN ribosomique (génétique)</term><term>Locus génétiques (génétique)</term><term>Marqueurs génétiques (génétique)</term><term>Phylogenèse (MeSH)</term><term>Phénomènes écologiques et environnementaux (MeSH)</term><term>Polymorphisme génétique (génétique)</term><term>Populus (génétique)</term><term>Répétitions microsatellites (génétique)</term><term>Évolution moléculaire (MeSH)</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" type="chemical" qualifier="genetics" xml:lang="en"><term>DNA, Chloroplast</term><term>DNA, Ribosomal Spacer</term><term>Genetic Markers</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="genetics" xml:lang="en"><term>Genetic Loci</term><term>Microsatellite Repeats</term><term>Polymorphism, Genetic</term><term>Populus</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" qualifier="génétique" xml:lang="fr"><term>ADN des chloroplastes</term><term>Espaceur de l'ADN ribosomique</term><term>Locus génétiques</term><term>Marqueurs génétiques</term><term>Polymorphisme génétique</term><term>Populus</term><term>Répétitions microsatellites</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="en"><term>Desert Climate</term><term>Ecological and Environmental Phenomena</term><term>Evolution, Molecular</term><term>Phylogeny</term></keywords><keywords scheme="MESH" xml:lang="fr"><term>Climat désertique</term><term>Phylogenèse</term><term>Phénomènes écologiques et environnementaux</term><term>Évolution moléculaire</term></keywords></textClass></profileDesc></teiHeader><front><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>BACKGROUND</b></p><p>The fixed genetic differences between ecologically divergent species were found to change greatly depending on the markers examined. With such species it is difficult to differentiate between shared ancestral polymorphisms and past introgressions between the diverging species. In order to disentangle these possibilities and provide a further case for DNA barcoding of plants, we examine genetic differentiation between two ecologically divergent poplar species, Populus euphratica Oliver and P. pruinosa Schrenk using three different types of genetic marker.</p></div><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS</b></p><p>We genotyped 290 individuals from 29 allopatric and sympatric populations, using chloroplast (cp) DNA, nuclear (nr) ITS sequences and eight simple sequence repeat (SSR) loci. Three major cpDNA haplotypes were widely shared between the two species and between-species cpDNA differentiation (F(CT)) was very low, even lower than among single species populations. The average SSR F(CT) values were higher. Bayesian clustering analysis of all loci allowed a clear delineation of the two species. Gene flow, determined by examining all SSR loci, was obvious but only slightly asymmetrical. However, the two species were almost fixed for two different nrITS genotypes that had the highest F(CT), although a few introgressed individuals were detected both in allopatric and sympatric populations.</p></div><div type="abstract" xml:lang="en"><p><b>CONCLUSIONS</b></p><p>The two species shared numerous ancestral polymorphisms at cpDNA and a few SSR loci. Both ITS and a combination of nuclear SSR data could be used to differentiate between the two species. Introgressions and gene flow were obvious between the two species either during or after their divergence. Our findings underscore the complex genetic differentiations between ecologically diverged species and highlight the importance of nuclear DNA (especially ITS) differentiation for delimiting closely related plant species.</p></div></front></TEI><pubmed><MedlineCitation Status="MEDLINE" Owner="NLM"><PMID Version="1">22028897</PMID><DateCompleted><Year>2012</Year><Month>02</Month><Day>24</Day></DateCompleted><DateRevised><Year>2018</Year><Month>11</Month><Day>13</Day></DateRevised><Article PubModel="Print-Electronic"><Journal><ISSN IssnType="Electronic">1932-6203</ISSN><JournalIssue CitedMedium="Internet"><Volume>6</Volume><Issue>10</Issue><PubDate><Year>2011</Year></PubDate></JournalIssue><Title>PloS one</Title><ISOAbbreviation>PLoS One</ISOAbbreviation></Journal><ArticleTitle>Genetic differentiation and delimitation between ecologically diverged Populus euphratica and P. pruinosa.</ArticleTitle><Pagination><MedlinePgn>e26530</MedlinePgn></Pagination><ELocationID EIdType="doi" ValidYN="Y">10.1371/journal.pone.0026530</ELocationID><Abstract><AbstractText Label="BACKGROUND" NlmCategory="BACKGROUND">The fixed genetic differences between ecologically divergent species were found to change greatly depending on the markers examined. With such species it is difficult to differentiate between shared ancestral polymorphisms and past introgressions between the diverging species. In order to disentangle these possibilities and provide a further case for DNA barcoding of plants, we examine genetic differentiation between two ecologically divergent poplar species, Populus euphratica Oliver and P. pruinosa Schrenk using three different types of genetic marker.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS" NlmCategory="RESULTS">We genotyped 290 individuals from 29 allopatric and sympatric populations, using chloroplast (cp) DNA, nuclear (nr) ITS sequences and eight simple sequence repeat (SSR) loci. Three major cpDNA haplotypes were widely shared between the two species and between-species cpDNA differentiation (F(CT)) was very low, even lower than among single species populations. The average SSR F(CT) values were higher. Bayesian clustering analysis of all loci allowed a clear delineation of the two species. Gene flow, determined by examining all SSR loci, was obvious but only slightly asymmetrical. However, the two species were almost fixed for two different nrITS genotypes that had the highest F(CT), although a few introgressed individuals were detected both in allopatric and sympatric populations.</AbstractText><AbstractText Label="CONCLUSIONS" NlmCategory="CONCLUSIONS">The two species shared numerous ancestral polymorphisms at cpDNA and a few SSR loci. Both ITS and a combination of nuclear SSR data could be used to differentiate between the two species. Introgressions and gene flow were obvious between the two species either during or after their divergence. Our findings underscore the complex genetic differentiations between ecologically diverged species and highlight the importance of nuclear DNA (especially ITS) differentiation for delimiting closely related plant species.</AbstractText></Abstract><AuthorList CompleteYN="Y"><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Wang</LastName><ForeName>Juan</ForeName><Initials>J</Initials><AffiliationInfo><Affiliation>Molecular Ecology Group, State Key Laboratory of Grassland Farming System, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.</Affiliation></AffiliationInfo></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Wu</LastName><ForeName>Yuxia</ForeName><Initials>Y</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Ren</LastName><ForeName>Guangpeng</ForeName><Initials>G</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Guo</LastName><ForeName>Qiuhong</ForeName><Initials>Q</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Liu</LastName><ForeName>Jianquan</ForeName><Initials>J</Initials></Author><Author ValidYN="Y"><LastName>Lascoux</LastName><ForeName>Martin</ForeName><Initials>M</Initials></Author></AuthorList><Language>eng</Language><PublicationTypeList><PublicationType UI="D016428">Journal Article</PublicationType><PublicationType UI="D013485">Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't</PublicationType></PublicationTypeList><ArticleDate DateType="Electronic"><Year>2011</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>19</Day></ArticleDate></Article><MedlineJournalInfo><Country>United States</Country><MedlineTA>PLoS One</MedlineTA><NlmUniqueID>101285081</NlmUniqueID><ISSNLinking>1932-6203</ISSNLinking></MedlineJournalInfo><ChemicalList><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D018742">DNA, Chloroplast</NameOfSubstance></Chemical><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D021903">DNA, Ribosomal Spacer</NameOfSubstance></Chemical><Chemical><RegistryNumber>0</RegistryNumber><NameOfSubstance UI="D005819">Genetic Markers</NameOfSubstance></Chemical></ChemicalList><CitationSubset>IM</CitationSubset><MeshHeadingList><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D018742" MajorTopicYN="N">DNA, Chloroplast</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000235" MajorTopicYN="N">genetics</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D021903" MajorTopicYN="N">DNA, Ribosomal Spacer</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000235" MajorTopicYN="N">genetics</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D003889" MajorTopicYN="N">Desert Climate</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D055669" MajorTopicYN="Y">Ecological and Environmental Phenomena</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D019143" MajorTopicYN="N">Evolution, Molecular</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D056426" MajorTopicYN="N">Genetic Loci</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000235" MajorTopicYN="N">genetics</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D005819" MajorTopicYN="N">Genetic Markers</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000235" MajorTopicYN="N">genetics</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D018895" MajorTopicYN="N">Microsatellite Repeats</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000235" MajorTopicYN="N">genetics</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D010802" MajorTopicYN="N">Phylogeny</DescriptorName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D011110" MajorTopicYN="N">Polymorphism, Genetic</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000235" MajorTopicYN="Y">genetics</QualifierName></MeshHeading><MeshHeading><DescriptorName UI="D032107" MajorTopicYN="N">Populus</DescriptorName><QualifierName UI="Q000235" MajorTopicYN="Y">genetics</QualifierName></MeshHeading></MeshHeadingList></MedlineCitation><PubmedData><History><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="received"><Year>2011</Year><Month>08</Month><Day>06</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="accepted"><Year>2011</Year><Month>09</Month><Day>28</Day></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="entrez"><Year>2011</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>27</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="pubmed"><Year>2011</Year><Month>10</Month><Day>27</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate><PubMedPubDate PubStatus="medline"><Year>2012</Year><Month>3</Month><Day>1</Day><Hour>6</Hour><Minute>0</Minute></PubMedPubDate></History><PublicationStatus>ppublish</PublicationStatus><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">22028897</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="doi">10.1371/journal.pone.0026530</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pii">PONE-D-11-15154</ArticleId><ArticleId IdType="pmc">PMC3197521</ArticleId></ArticleIdList><ReferenceList><Reference><Citation>Mol Ecol Resour. 2008 Sep;8(5):1142-4</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21585996</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Mol Ecol. 2010 Mar;19(6):1239-52</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20163546</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2003 Dec;29(3):417-34</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">14615184</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Genetics. 1943 Mar;28(2):139-56</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17247075</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Science. 2009 Feb 6;323(5915):737-41</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19197053</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Genetics. 2010 May;185(1):313-26</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20176979</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Genetics. 2000 Jun;155(2):945-59</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">10835412</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>New Phytol. 2010 Nov;188(3):892-901</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20723077</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>PLoS One. 2010 Jan 07;5(1):e8613</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20062805</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Heredity (Edinb). 2011 Oct;107(4):362-70</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21448232</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Evolution. 2008 Aug;62(8):1908-20</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18452573</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>New Phytol. 2011 Dec;192(4):1024-33</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21883235</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009 Aug 4;106(31):12794-7</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19666622</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Mol Ecol. 2005 Apr;14(4):1045-57</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15773935</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Evolution. 1997 Apr;51(2):622-626</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">28565366</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Mol Ecol Resour. 2009 Sep;9(5):1322-32</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21564903</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Genetics. 1999 Jun;152(2):763-73</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">10353916</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Mol Ecol. 2009 May;18(10):2228-42</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19302359</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Tree Physiol. 2011 Apr;31(4):452-61</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21427158</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Genetics. 1996 Nov;144(3):1237-45</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">8913764</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Nucleic Acids Res. 1997 Dec 15;25(24):4876-82</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">9396791</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Science. 2007 Oct 12;318(5848):190-1</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17932267</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Mol Ecol. 2004 Jan;13(1):167-78</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">14653797</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>New Phytol. 2010 Nov;188(3):879-91</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20659302</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Mol Ecol. 2010 Apr;19(7):1367-80</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20298471</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Dec;84(24):9054-8</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">3480529</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Mol Ecol. 2005 Jul;14(8):2611-20</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15969739</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Mol Biol Evol. 1999 Jan;16(1):37-48</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">10331250</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1973 Dec;70(12):3321-3</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">4519626</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Plant Mol Biol. 2007 Sep;65(1-2):1-11</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17605111</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Evol Bioinform Online. 2007 Feb 23;1:47-50</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19325852</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Evolution. 2001 Apr;55(4):703-11</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">11392388</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Tree Physiol. 2008 Jun;28(6):947-57</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18381275</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Mol Ecol. 2008 Dec;17(23):5157-74</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19120994</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Trends Ecol Evol. 2009 Jul;24(7):386-93</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">19409650</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Plant Mol Biol. 2010 Jun;73(3):251-69</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20157764</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2004 Feb 29;359(1442):275-84; discussion 284</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15101583</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Mol Ecol. 2010 Mar;19(5):940-51</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20149093</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Transgenic Res. 2006 Oct;15(5):637-46</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16952016</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Mol Ecol. 1999 Mar;8(3):521-3</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">10199016</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Am Nat. 2010 Dec;176 Suppl 1:S4-S25</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">21043779</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Evolution. 2010 Aug;64(8):2342-52</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">20298431</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2008 Dec;49(3):827-31</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">18838124</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Heredity (Edinb). 2006 Oct;97(4):254-5</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16788705</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Plant Physiol. 2005 Dec;139(4):1762-72</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">16299175</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Plant Cell Environ. 2007 Jul;30(7):775-85</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">17547650</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Am J Bot. 1999 Dec;86(12):1742-53</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">10602767</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>J Hered. 2004 Nov-Dec;95(6):536-9</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15475402</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference><Reference><Citation>Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005 Jun 7;102(23):8369-74</Citation><ArticleIdList><ArticleId IdType="pubmed">15928076</ArticleId></ArticleIdList></Reference></ReferenceList></PubmedData></pubmed><affiliations><list><country><li>République populaire de Chine</li></country></list><tree><noCountry><name sortKey="Guo, Qiuhong" sort="Guo, Qiuhong" uniqKey="Guo Q" first="Qiuhong" last="Guo">Qiuhong Guo</name><name sortKey="Lascoux, Martin" sort="Lascoux, Martin" uniqKey="Lascoux M" first="Martin" last="Lascoux">Martin Lascoux</name><name sortKey="Liu, Jianquan" sort="Liu, Jianquan" uniqKey="Liu J" first="Jianquan" last="Liu">Jianquan Liu</name><name sortKey="Ren, Guangpeng" sort="Ren, Guangpeng" uniqKey="Ren G" first="Guangpeng" last="Ren">Guangpeng Ren</name><name sortKey="Wu, Yuxia" sort="Wu, Yuxia" uniqKey="Wu Y" first="Yuxia" last="Wu">Yuxia Wu</name></noCountry><country name="République populaire de Chine"><noRegion><name sortKey="Wang, Juan" sort="Wang, Juan" uniqKey="Wang J" first="Juan" last="Wang">Juan Wang</name></noRegion></country></tree></affiliations></record>Pour manipuler ce document sous Unix (Dilib)
EXPLOR_STEP=$WICRI_ROOT/Bois/explor/PoplarV1/Data/Main/Exploration
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_STEP/biblio.hfd -nk 002E66 | SxmlIndent | more
Ou
HfdSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd -nk 002E66 | SxmlIndent | more
Pour mettre un lien sur cette page dans le réseau Wicri
{{Explor lien
|wiki= Bois
|area= PoplarV1
|flux= Main
|étape= Exploration
|type= RBID
|clé= pubmed:22028897
|texte= Genetic differentiation and delimitation between ecologically diverged Populus euphratica and P. pruinosa.
}}
Pour générer des pages wiki
HfdIndexSelect -h $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/RBID.i -Sk "pubmed:22028897" \
| HfdSelect -Kh $EXPLOR_AREA/Data/Main/Exploration/biblio.hfd \
| NlmPubMed2Wicri -a PoplarV1
| This area was generated with Dilib version V0.6.37. |  |